|
|
|
|
|
The Tallis Scholars
by Peter Phillips (excerpts) /
The Spectator (1996)
Much has been written about the gradual changes
to the repertoire of classical music concerts over recent years.
I myself have contributed to these writings, since the music I present
to the public as standard concert fare - renaissance sacred music
- could not have been considered as such 20 years ago. Other repertories
are involved: French baroque music, mediaeval courtly song, modern
multi-media compositions, to mention a few. To counterbalance this
enlargement of interest there has been a slow decline in the number
of string quartets, Lieder and other recitals of the more traditional
sort.
What interests me is the kind of halls which
are now being built to accommodate the modern concert series. The
Tallis Scholars are currently involved in a tour of England which
has yielded the most extraordinarily diverse set of venues, from
the Wigmore Hall to the Birmingham Symphony Hall, from St. John's
College Chapel in Cambridge to Chester Cathedral to the Opera House
in Buxton. You might immediately say that a recital of renaissance
sacred music is bound to be more suited to the religious buildings
on this list than to the others. But this is the point: all but
one of these spaces have good and bad points for the sound of renaissance
polyphony, just as they do, in fact, for symphony concerts, small
operatic productions, piano recitals, string quartets and everything
else promoters are obliged to stage in them for lack of better alternatives.
None is ideal.
Most of them were built in the past for a particular
purpose, and under modern conditions have been adapted to a more
general use. The chapel and the cathedral were designed in the first
instance for religious worship, a by-product of which was the singing
of plainchant which is still the only music which ideally suits
them. I would not pontificate on what the Buxton Opera House was
originally intended for, but I warrant it wasn't for Allegri's Miserere,
which we have sung there, dramatic though its divided choirs effects
may be. The Wigmore Hall remains perhaps the classic case of a fine
hall built for a specific purpose which has had to be made more
general in the 1990s. I have heard chamber orchestras, choirs, mediaeval
bands and lutes in there; and although none of these things has
sounded as convincing as the kind of chamber music for which it
was designed, no one has dared to say that it will not do.
It would never have occurred to me that in the
strictest sense it doesn't do, if I had not heard the acoustics
of the Birmingham Symphony Hall. Everything good you have heard
about this space it true. Not only is it an impressively modern
interior to look at (the outside is compromised by its surroundings)
but the sound is beautiful wherever you may be sitting in it. And
I am told that on account of the cunning flapping doors in the galleries,
which are designed to modify the degree of reverberation throughout
the chamber, this holds true for any kind of music. For my own part,
I would say that sacred polyphony, originally written for a very
different kind of place, has never sounded so good as it does there.
The explanation is that the Birmingham Hall is
a fully professional kind of hall... . It has been designed and
built as near as humanly possible to allow an even sound throughout
the length and breadth of it, in as many different repertories as
may be staged there. I also believe it has the concert sound which
is slowly becoming the norm as a result of listening to CDs: crystal
clarity without hard edges, a roundness without intrusive reverberation.
This might be compared with the sound in 'amateur' venues like a
cathedral nave, where there is precious little clarity to be had
anywhere in the building, and where the intensity of the playing
or singing reduces as you retreat from the platform. A person sitting
at the back of a cathedral will have a completely different aural
experience from someone sitting in the middle, and again from someone
sitting at the front. Ultimately this treatment does the music too
much of a disservice to be satisfactory.
The rethink in concert planning has been caused
by changing tastes and shrinking audiences. It has been obvious
for some time that the town-hall or cathedral-type of event are
not the way forward. If city councils want to encourage classical
music as a lively alternative to the more popular forms, in ways
which make the whole concept of serious music attractive and approachable
without cheapening it, they should emulate Birmingham. It would
pay them dividends.
|
|